FAMILY-LED • EVIDENCE-BASED
FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE

Retrospective abolition of the IPP sentence

On 30 August 2026, the Prime Minister committed the Government to bringing the injustice of IPP sentences to an end during this Parliament. This historic breakthrough must now become urgent, retrospective legislation with a clear timetable, independent judicial decision-making, funded mental-health and resettlement support, and genuine engagement with victims and survivors focused on safer, better criminal justice outcomes. Until every remaining IPP and DPP sentence has been lawfully extinguished, our work continues.

TRUTH • ACCOUNTABILITY • JUSTICE

The People’s Inquiry into the IPP Sentence

Truth. Accountability. Reparation. Non-Recurrence.

IPP Committee in Action is establishing an independent, evidence-led People’s Inquiry into the creation, operation and continuing consequences of the Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence.

The Inquiry will place affected people, bereaved families, victims and survivors of crime, practitioners, researchers and wider communities at the centre of a serious examination of what happened, why recognised harms were allowed to continue and what justice now requires.

National Lived Experience and Victims’ Justice Council

Meaningful participation will be embedded through two equal and independently supported structures:

The Victims and Survivors Panel
A dedicated route through which victims and survivors of crime can shape the Inquiry’s questions, evidence and recommendations and contribute to better, safer and more effective criminal justice outcomes.

The IPP Lived Experience and Families Panel
A dedicated route through which people serving or formerly subject to IPP/DPP sentences, bereaved families and affected relatives can shape the Inquiry’s questions, evidence and recommendations.

Participation will have genuine influence. Victims, survivors, affected people and bereaved families will not be used as decoration, political theatre or a means of scoring political points.

The Inquiry will investigate deaths, prolonged imprisonment, recall, mental and physical health, family harm, institutional decision-making, professional responsibility and the measures required for accountability, reparation and non-recurrence.

The People’s Inquiry is underway. Its multidisciplinary team is established and continuing to grow, with formal launch and public-engagement plans already in development. Further details will be announced through official Inquiry channels at the appropriate time.

 WHO WE ARE

An international civil society movement for complete abolition

Founded by Shirley de Bono and built through years of sustained advocacy, IPP Committee in Action has grown into an international civil society movement involving families and people directly affected by IPP. Her work has taken the campaign into Parliament and the United Nations and now brings lived experience into dialogue with senior legal, clinical, academic and human rights expertise. We campaign for the complete retrospective abolition of every remaining IPP and DPP sentence, urgent review led by independent judges and accountability for the enduring harm caused.

We are also convening The People’s Inquiry into the IPP Sentence: Truth, Accountability, Reparation and Non-Recurrence, an independently chaired investigation lasting 24 months that will establish the truth, document harm, secure accountability, develop proposals for reparation and prevent recurrence.

OUR MISSION

Abolition must mean abolition

IPP Committee in Action campaigns for urgent primary legislation to extinguish every remaining IPP and DPP sentence—whether a person is imprisoned, detained following recall or living in the community.

We demand:

• urgent decisions led by a National IPP Judicial Panel—not years of further delay controlled by probation;

• an immediate legality audit of every remaining sentence;

• an independent judicial examination of every current and historical OASys assessment, directed and determined by senior judges with assistance from independent multidisciplinary experts—not conducted or controlled by probation. Probation must disclose its records and evidence, but it must not review its own work or decide the outcome;

• publication of the evidence needed for public accountability; and

• immediate unconditional release wherever the State cannot prove a current, serious and offence-relevant risk using recent, reliable evidence.

For the very small number of exceptional cases where a grave current risk is proved, the IPP sentence must still end. Any transitional order must be judicially controlled, strictly limited and non-renewable. A discretionary life sentence may be considered only by three senior judges where it was legally available and justified by the original offending—never manufactured retrospectively from an OASys score.

Risk may determine the lawful route out of IPP. It must never determine whether IPP continues to exist. One hundred civil society figures signed our joint letter opposing the Indeterminate Sentence for Public Protection (IPP).

IPP IN NUMBERS

8,711 people received an IPP sentence.

As of 30 June 2026:

856 remained imprisoned without ever having been released.

1,415 were imprisoned following recall.

2,271 people were therefore being held in custody under IPP.

Around eight in ten tariff-expired, never-released IPP prisoners had already served at least ten years beyond tariff.

Source: Ministry of Justice, 30 June 2026

HUNDREDS HAVE DIED. THE PUBLIC STILL HAS NO COMPLETE ACCOUNT

Evidence submitted to Parliament recorded 69 self-inflicted deaths and 159 deaths from other causes among IPP prisoners—at least 228 deaths in custody by 2021. The Prisons and Probation Ombudsman subsequently confirmed 78 self-inflicted deaths by December 2022. A separate Freedom of Information response identified 122 deaths between January 2015 and February 2025, using a narrower period but a wider setting that included prisons, young offender institutions, approved premises and deaths within 14 days of release. Of those 122 deaths, 27 were classified as self-inflicted. These figures overlap and must not be added together. However, their different dates, definitions and populations expose the central failure: the Government has never published one complete, current and transparent record of every person who has died while subject to IPP. Public discussion that counts only self-inflicted deaths presents an incomplete picture. A classification of “natural causes” does not, by itself, establish that indefinite detention, chronic stress, deteriorating health, delayed treatment, prison conditions or institutional neglect played no contributory role. Not every death can automatically be attributed to IPP. Every death must, however, be independently examined to determine whether the sentence, post-tariff detention, recall, psychological deterioration or failures of care caused or contributed to it. IPP Committee in Action demands a complete public record covering deaths in custody, approved premises and the community, including each person’s tariff, time served beyond tariff, release and recall history, recorded cause of death, inquest findings and any sentence-related contributing factors. Until that record is published, the State cannot credibly claim to know—or have disclosed—the full human cost of IPP.

Sources: Parliamentary evidence, 2021; Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, 2023; PPO Freedom of Information response 615, 2025.

THE OFFENCES FOR WHICH IPP WAS IMPOSED

IPP was not confined to one narrow category of offending. Although the legislation identified 153 specified offences, IPP sentences were imposed across 107 different offences.

• 3,045 for violent offences — 35%

• 2,508 for sexual offences — 27.8%

• 1,882 for robbery offences — 21.6%

• 448 for arson and fire-setting offences — 5.1%

• 355 for other offences — 4.1%

• 232 for acquisitive offences — 2.7%

• 226 for weapons offences — 2.6%

• 11 for drug offences — 0.1%

Approximately 70 people received an IPP for offences for which life imprisonment is not available today, even as the maximum penalty.

This breakdown does not diminish the seriousness of any offence or the harm suffered by victims. It demonstrates how widely IPP was imposed—and why the remaining IPP population cannot be treated as one undifferentiated group.

Source: UNGRIPP, IPP by Numbers, using Ministry of Justice data.

Data note: the published offence categories account for 8,707 sentences, while the published overall total is 8,711. The source does not identify the remaining four cases.

our fight for justice

IPP Committee in Action campaigns for the complete retrospective abolition of every remaining IPP and DPP sentence.

We bring together people directly affected by IPP, families, researchers, legal and clinical experts and civil-society allies. Through the People’s Inquiry, evidence gathering, public advocacy and political engagement, we expose the continuing harm caused by IPP and press for truth, accountability, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence.

STAND WITH US

Whether you are directly affected by IPP, supporting somebody you love, a victim or survivor of crime, working within the justice system or committed to safer and fairer justice, you can help shape what comes next. Share the evidence, support the People’s Inquiry and help us hold the Government to its commitment. Together, we must ensure that legislation ends every remaining IPP and DPP sentence through a fair and lawful process, protects victims and the public, and provides properly funded support for everyone affected.

WRITE TO YOUR MP

On 30 August 2026, the Prime Minister committed the Government to ending the injustice of IPP sentences during this Parliament. That commitment must now become clear, effective legislation. Ask your MP to demand a published timetable, independent judicial decision-making, meaningful engagement with victims and survivors, full disclosure of the evidence needed for accountability, and properly funded mental-health, resettlement and public-protection support.

LATEST NEWS & CAMPAIGN UPDATES

Follow the latest legal developments, People’s Inquiry announcements, campaign activity and media coverage of the continuing IPP injustice.